1996 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.8 16V (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Volvo S40 vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
S40Model146
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1731 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
115 HPPower129 HP
165 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
4483 mmLength4257 mm
1717 mmWidth1712 mm
1411 mmHeight1425 mm
1286 KgWeight1225 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo S40 and 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…