1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
Space Wagon
Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2.0 GLXi (N33W) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Wagon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
Alfa RomeoMakeMitsubishi
146ModelSpace Wagon
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
10,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
129 HPPower133 HP
148 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
4257 mmLength4515 mm
1712 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1615 mm
1225 KgWeight1351 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…