1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 146
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda Protege
Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
146ModelProtege
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda Protege
10,2 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
129 HPPower85 HP
148 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/60 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda Protege
4257 mmLength4035 mm
1712 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1170 mm
1225 KgWeight1323 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 146 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…