1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda MX-3
Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
146ModelMX-3
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda MX-3
10,2 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
202 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
129 HPPower105 HP
148 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationMazda MX-3
4257 mmLength4220 mm
1712 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1310 mm
1225 KgWeight1060 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…