DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeHonda
146ModelCivic
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
202 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
129 HPPower114 HP
148 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4257 mmLength4190 mm
1712 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1375 mm
1225 KgWeight1105 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…