1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Daewoo Musso Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationDaewoo Musso
Alfa RomeoMakeDaewoo
146ModelMusso
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationDaewoo Musso
10,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
202 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower129 HP
148 NmTorque179 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationDaewoo Musso
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationDaewoo Musso
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationDaewoo Musso
4257 mmLength4640 mm
1712 mmWidth1864 mm
1425 mmHeight1735 mm
1225 KgWeight1890 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…