DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2000 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
Space RunnerModelS60
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
225 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4576 mm
1695 mmWidth1804 mm
1650 mmHeight1428 mm
1400 KgWeight1501 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2000 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…