DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo S60 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S60ModelSpace Runner
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque225 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4576 mmLength4290 mm
1804 mmWidth1695 mm
1428 mmHeight1650 mm
1501 KgWeight1400 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo S60 and 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…