DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
L 200ModelSpace Runner
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
142 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
132 HPPower150 HP
192 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4290 mm
1655 mmWidth1695 mm
1570 mmHeight1650 mm
1660 KgWeight1400 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…