DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 2000 Nissan Largo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
Space RunnerModelLargo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2388 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
225 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,67 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4610 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1650 mmHeight1905 mm
1400 KgWeight1620 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 2000 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…