DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1996 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
Space RunnerModelSharan
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
175 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
122 HPPower110 HP
161 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4620 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1680 mmHeight1730 mm
1315 KgWeight1665 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1996 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…