1996 • Volkswagen
Sharan
Volkswagen Sharan 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Volkswagen Sharan vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1.8 4x4 (N21W) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
VolkswagenMakeMitsubishi
SharanModelSpace Runner
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
16,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
172 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
110 HPPower122 HP
235 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4620 mmLength4270 mm
1810 mmWidth1695 mm
1730 mmHeight1680 mm
1665 KgWeight1315 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volkswagen Sharan and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…