DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
MeganeModelSpace Runner
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
183 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
98 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4270 mm
1699 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1680 mm
1135 KgWeight1315 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…