DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space RunnerModelMegane
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
175 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower98 HP
161 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1699 mm
1680 mmHeight1420 mm
1315 KgWeight1135 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…