DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Montero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
MonteroModelCommodore
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
202 HPPower200 HP
318 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R16 HTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4795 mmLength4884 mm
1875 mmWidth1842 mm
1855 mmHeight1450 mm
2135 KgWeight1550 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Montero and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…