DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Frontera vs 2000 Mitsubishi Montero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
FronteraModelMontero
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
192 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
205 HPPower202 HP
290 NmTorque318 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank90 lt
17 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size265/70 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4795 mm
1785 mmWidth1875 mm
1690 mmHeight1855 mm
1785 KgWeight2135 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Frontera and 2000 Mitsubishi Montero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…