DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Mitsubishi Montero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Montero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
CommodoreModelMontero
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
200 HPPower202 HP
304 NmTorque318 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank90 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4795 mm
1842 mmWidth1875 mm
1450 mmHeight1855 mm
1550 KgWeight2135 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 2000 Mitsubishi Montero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…