DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
LegnumModel156
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
165 HPPower136 HP
217 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16VTyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4430 mm
1760 mmWidth1745 mm
1470 mmHeight1415 mm
1550 KgWeight1350 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…