DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMitsubishi
FreelanderModelLegnum
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
177 HPPower165 HP
240 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size225/50 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4740 mm
1809 mmWidth1760 mm
1709 mmHeight1470 mm
1550 KgWeight1550 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…