DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMitsubishi
156ModelLegnum
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
136 HPPower165 HP
304 NmTorque217 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60R15Tyre size225/50 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4740 mm
1745 mmWidth1760 mm
1415 mmHeight1470 mm
1350 KgWeight1550 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…