DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
LegnumModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower177 HP
217 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50 R16VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4433 mm
1760 mmWidth1809 mm
1470 mmHeight1709 mm
1550 KgWeight1550 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…