2009 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.6 (105 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
LancerModelPolo
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
12,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
181 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
98 HPPower105 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4485 mmLength3897 mm
1695 mmWidth1650 mm
1480 mmHeight1465 mm
1360 KgWeight1095 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…