2009 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 (100 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.5/100
2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V50ModelLancer
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
12,0 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
150 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4522 mmLength4485 mm
1845 mmWidth1695 mm
1457 mmHeight1480 mm
1335 KgWeight1360 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…