2009 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
2009 Ford C-Max vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
FordMakeMitsubishi
C-MaxModelLancer
2009Model year2009
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
12,9 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
175 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
143 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4372 mmLength4485 mm
1825 mmWidth1695 mm
1595 mmHeight1480 mm
1344 KgWeight1360 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford C-Max and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…