2009 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 1.6i (102 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
LancerModelCaddy
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
12,6 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
181 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
98 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4485 mmLength4875 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1480 mmHeight1834 mm
1360 KgWeight1558-1664 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase3002 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2009 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…