2009 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2009Overall Score53.25/100
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Renault Megane
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationRenault Megane
MitsubishiMakeRenault
LancerModelMegane
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationRenault Megane
12,6 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
181 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationRenault Megane
4485 mmLength4295 mm
1695 mmWidth1808 mm
1480 mmHeight1471 mm
1360 KgWeight1205 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2641 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2009 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…