DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 FAW Vita Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Vita

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFAW
LancerModelVita
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
181 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4245 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1480 mmHeight1500 mm
1360 KgWeight1020 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2425 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2009 FAW Vita approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Vita leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…