DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMitsubishi
Range RoverModelL 200
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
136 HPPower100 HP
270 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4500 mm
1853 mmWidth1655 mm
1817 mmHeight1570 mm
2115 KgWeight1810 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…