DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2004 Toyota Cami Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10 points.

62.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
L 200ModelCami
2000Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

142 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption7,14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R15

Dimensions

4500 mmLength3785 mm
1655 mmWidth1555 mm
1570 mmHeight1675 mm
1810 KgWeight1040 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2420 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2004 Toyota Cami approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…