DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
L 200ModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
142 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
100 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4713 mm
1655 mmWidth1853 mm
1570 mmHeight1817 mm
1810 KgWeight2115 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…