DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
L 200ModelXC70
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
178 HPPower175 HP
400 NmTorque420 Nm
—Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4838 mm
1750 mmWidth1861 mm
1775 mmHeight1604 mm
1900 KgWeight1742 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…