2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 HP DI-D (178 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi L 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL 200
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
143 HPPower178 HP
330 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
5075 mmLength5185 mm
1805 mmWidth1750 mm
1745 mmHeight1775 mm
—Weight1900 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…