2010 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
2010 Volvo S80 vs 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 HP DI-D (178 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi L 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S80ModelL 200
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
175 HPPower178 HP
420 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4851 mmLength5185 mm
1861 mmWidth1750 mm
1493 mmHeight1775 mm
1647 KgWeight1900 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo S80 and 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…