DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
L 200ModelRanger
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
178 HPPower143 HP
400 NmTorque330 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength5075 mm
1750 mmWidth1805 mm
1775 mmHeight1745 mm
1900 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…