DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
L 200Model80
1996Model year1995
Pick-upBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,1 s
142 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
132 HPPower133 HP
192 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4482 mm
1655 mmWidth1695 mm
1570 mmHeight1408 mm
1660 KgWeight1310 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi L 200 and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…