1996 • Chrysler
Sebring
Chrysler Sebring 2.4 i 16V (152 Hp) 1996Overall Score59.25/100
1996 Chrysler Sebring vs 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.4 4x4 (132 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Chrysler Sebring
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
ChryslerMakeMitsubishi
SebringModelL 200
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typePick-up
4Seats4
2Doors4
Performance
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
11,2 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
152 HPPower132 HP
226 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4902 mmLength4500 mm
1757 mmWidth1655 mm
1392 mmHeight1570 mm
1515 KgWeight1660 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Chrysler Sebring and 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…