1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.3 E (133 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.4 4x4 (132 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi L 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
AudiMakeMitsubishi
80ModelL 200
1995Model year1996
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
133 HPPower132 HP
186 NmTorque192 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4482 mmLength4500 mm
1695 mmWidth1655 mm
1408 mmHeight1570 mm
1310 KgWeight1660 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…