DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
L 200ModelPassat
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
142 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
154 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4703 mm
1655 mmWidth1746 mm
1570 mmHeight1462 mm
1380 KgWeight1340 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…