DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
LagunaModelL 200
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower95 HP
168 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4508 mmLength4500 mm
1752 mmWidth1655 mm
1432 mmHeight1570 mm
1255 KgWeight1380 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…