DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Passat vs 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMitsubishi
PassatModelL 200
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
115 HPPower95 HP
172 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4500 mm
1746 mmWidth1655 mm
1462 mmHeight1570 mm
1340 KgWeight1380 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Passat and 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…