DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
L 200ModelL 200
2000Model year1998
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

142 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
154 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/70 R15

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4500 mm
1655 mmWidth1655 mm
1570 mmHeight1570 mm
1380 KgWeight1380 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…