DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2003 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeJaguar
GTOModelX-type
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2968 cc
225 HPPower231 HP
275 NmTorque279 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption14,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R17 VTyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4672 mm
1840 mmWidth1789 mm
1285 mmHeight1430 mm
1640 KgWeight1570 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi GTO and 2003 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…