DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar X-type vs 2003 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMitsubishi
X-typeModelGTO
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2968 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
231 HPPower225 HP
279 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,3 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4575 mm
1789 mmWidth1840 mm
1430 mmHeight1285 mm
1570 KgWeight1640 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar X-type and 2003 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…