DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMitsubishi
CTSModelGTO
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
238 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
223 HPPower225 HP
296 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4575 mm
1793 mmWidth1840 mm
1440 mmHeight1285 mm
1628 KgWeight1640 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…