DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
EclipseModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
208 HPPower185 HP
278 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank74 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/50 R17Tyre size265/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4530 mm
1750 mmWidth1775 mm
1310 mmHeight1730 mm
1480 KgWeight1830 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…