DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ChallengerModelEclipse
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
170 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
185 HPPower208 HP
265 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank62 lt
16 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4455 mm
1775 mmWidth1750 mm
1730 mmHeight1310 mm
1830 KgWeight1480 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…