DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Opel Omega vs 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
OmegaModelEclipse
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
243 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
211 HPPower208 HP
270 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4455 mm
1785 mmWidth1750 mm
1450 mmHeight1310 mm
1605 KgWeight1480 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Opel Omega and 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…