DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
ColtModel156
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower120 HP
145 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3870 mmLength4435 mm
1695 mmWidth1743 mm
1550 mmHeight1430 mm
990 KgWeight1265 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Colt and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…