DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Fusion vs 2004 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
FusionModelColt
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
176 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
204 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4020 mmLength3870 mm
1708 mmWidth1695 mm
1503 mmHeight1550 mm
1105 KgWeight990 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Fusion and 2004 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…