DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeMitsubishi
ForfourModelColt
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
95 HPPower109 HP
210 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3870 mm
1684 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1550 mm
965 KgWeight990 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…